| Date | Fri, 15 Dec 2023 14:50:59 -0800 | From | Jakub Kicinski <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next 00/24] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking. |
| |
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 18:07:19 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > The proposed way out is to introduce explicit per-CPU locks for > resources which are protected by local_bh_disable() and use those only > on PREEMPT_RT so there is no additional overhead for !PREEMPT_RT builds.
As I said at LPC, complicating drivers with odd locking constructs is a no go for me.
|