Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 15 Dec 2023 10:46:02 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH for-next v7 0/7] On-Demand Paging on SoftRoCE | From | Zhu Yanjun <> |
| |
在 2023/12/14 13:55, Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu) 写道: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 3:08 AM Zhu Yanjun wrote: >> 在 2023/12/7 14:37, Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu) 写道: >>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 10:51 AM Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>>> 在 2023/12/5 8:11, Jason Gunthorpe 写道: >>>>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:44:45PM +0900, Daisuke Matsuda wrote: >>>>>> Daisuke Matsuda (7): >>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Always defer tasks on responder and completer to workqueue >>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Make MR functions accessible from other rxe source code >>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Move resp_states definition to rxe_verbs.h >>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Add page invalidation support >>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Allow registering MRs for On-Demand Paging >>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Add support for Send/Recv/Write/Read with ODP >>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Add support for the traditional Atomic operations with ODP >>>>> What is the current situation with rxe? I don't recall seeing the bugs >>>>> that were reported get fixed? >>> Well, I suppose Jason is mentioning "blktests srp/002 hang". >>> cf. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/dsg6rd66tyiei32zaxs6ddv5ebefr5vtxjwz6d2ewqrcwisogl@ge7jzan7dg5u/T/ >>> >>> It is likely to be a timing issue. Bob reported that "siw hangs with the debug kernel", >>> so the hang looks not specific to rxe. >>> cf. https://lore.kernel.org/all/53ede78a-f73d-44cd-a555-f8ff36bd9c55@acm.org/T/ >>> I think we need to decide whether to continue to block patches to rxe since nobody has successfully fixed the issue. >>> >>> >>> There is another issue that causes kernel panic. >>> [bug report][bisected] rdma_rxe: blktests srp lead kernel panic with 64k page size >>> cf. https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHj4cs9XRqE25jyVw9rj9YugffLn5+f=1znaBEnu1usLOciD+g@mail.gmail.com/T/ >>> >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/list/?series=798592&state=* >>> Zhijian has submitted patches to fix this, and he got some comments. >>> It looks he is involved in CXL driver intensively these days. >>> I guess he is still working on it. >>> >>>> Exactly. A problem is reported in the link >>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg120947.html >>>> >>>> It seems that a variable 'entry' set but not used >>>> [-Wunused-but-set-variable] >>> Yeah, I can revise the patch anytime. >>> >>>> And ODP is an important feature. Should we suggest to add a test case >>>> about this ODP in rdma-core to verify this ODP feature? >>> Rxe can share the same tests with mlx5. >>> I added test cases for Write, Read and Atomic operations with ODP, >>> and we can add more tests if there are any suggestions. >>> Cf. https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/blob/master/tests/test_odp.py >> Thanks a lot. >> Do you make tests with blktests after your patches are applied with the >> latest kernel? > I have not done that yet, but I agree I should do it. > I will try to take time for the test before submitting v8
Thanks. Hope blktest can work well with your commits.
Zhu Yanjun
> > Thanks, > Daisuke Matsuda > > >> Zhu Yanjun >> >>> Thanks, >>> Daisuke Matsuda >>> >>>> Zhu Yanjun >>>> >>>>> I'm reluctant to dig a deeper hold until it is done? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Jason
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |