lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: correct QDU1000 reg entries
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:25:25PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>
>
> On 11/7/2023 1:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Qualcomm QDU1000 DTSI comes with one LLCC0 base address as pointed by
> > dtbs_check:
> >
> > qdu1000-idp.dtb: system-cache-controller@19200000: reg-names:2: 'llcc2_base' was expected
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Recent LLCC patches were not tested on QDU1000 thus the LLCC is there
> > broken. This patch at least tries to bring some sense according to
> > DTSI, but I have no clue what is here correct: driver, DTS or bindings.
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
> > index 580f9a97ddf7..d610b0be262c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
> > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ allOf:
> > compatible:
> > contains:
> > enum:
> > + - qcom,qdu1000-llcc
> > - qcom,sc7180-llcc
> > - qcom,sm6350-llcc
>
> Thanks, again.
>
> Acked-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>

I'm assuming given your employer, this ack means that there is no
llcc2_base on the qdu1000.

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-20 13:53    [W:0.072 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site