Messages in this thread | | | From | Rob Herring <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: honeywell,mprls0025pa: drop ref from pressure properties | Date | Wed, 29 Nov 2023 06:27:55 -0600 |
| |
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:10:41 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The dtschema treats now properties with '-pascal' suffix as standard one > and already defines $ref for them, thus the $ref should be dropped from > the bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > --- > > dtschema change was merged: > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/commit/2a1708dcf4ff0b25c4ec46304d6d6cc655c3e635 > but not yet released as new dtschema version. > > This change should be applied once new dtschema version is released or > Rob says otherwise. > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/pressure/honeywell,mprls0025pa.yaml | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >
My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
yamllint warnings/errors:
dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/pressure/honeywell,mprls0025pa.yaml: honeywell,pmin-pascal: missing type definition /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/pressure/honeywell,mprls0025pa.yaml: honeywell,pmax-pascal: missing type definition
doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20231129111041.26782-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency should be noted in *this* patch.
If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
| |