lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] genirq/irq_sim: misc updates
    On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 8:59 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:18:15AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
    > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:59 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
    > > >
    > > > Here are a couple of updates to the interrupt simulator. Two are minor:
    > > > remove an unused field and reorder includes for readability. The third
    > > > one simplifies the error paths by using new cleanup macros. To that end
    > > > we also add a cleanup definition for dynamic bitmaps.
    > > >
    > > > Resending rebased on top of v6.7-rc1 and with tags collected.
    > > >
    > > > v1 -> v2:
    > > > - add a NULL-pointer check to the bitmap cleanup macro as advised by
    > > > Peter Zijlstra
    > > > - initialize managed pointers when declaring them to create a clear pairing
    > > > between the type and the cleanup action
    > > >
    > > > Bartosz Golaszewski (4):
    > > > bitmap: define a cleanup function for bitmaps
    > > > genirq/irq_sim: remove unused field from struct irq_sim_irq_ctx
    > > > genirq/irq_sim: order headers alphabetically
    > > > genirq/irq_sim: shrink code by using cleanup helpers
    > > >
    > > > include/linux/bitmap.h | 3 +++
    > > > kernel/irq/irq_sim.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
    > > > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
    > > >
    > > > --
    > > > 2.40.1
    > > >
    > >
    > > It's been two weeks since this submission and ~2.5 months since the
    > > first one so I guess, a gentle ping is in order. This is not a very
    > > controversial series - can this be applied?
    >
    > Hi Bartosz,
    >
    > I'm the first in the list for this series, but really only 1st patch
    > is related to bitmaps, and I already acked it. If you prefer that, I
    > can pull it in the bitmap tree.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Yury

    If there's a risk it will conflict then you can apply it and provide
    Thomas with an immutable branch against the irq tree, otherwise I
    think Thomas can pick up all the patches.

    Bartosz

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-11-29 21:52    [W:3.603 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site