Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:30:29 +0100 | From | Neil Armstrong <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Revert panel fixes and original buggy patch |
| |
Hi Linus,
On 28/11/2023 00:36, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:25 AM Laurent Pinchart > <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:10:18AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> This series reverts the attempts to fix the bug that went >>> into v6.7-rc1 in commit 199cf07ebd2b >>> "drm/bridge: panel: Add a device link between drm device and panel device" >>> and then it reverts that patch as well. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> Linus Walleij (3): >>> Revert "driver core: Export device_is_dependent() to modules" >>> Revert "drm/bridge: panel: Check device dependency before managing device link" >>> Revert "drm/bridge: panel: Add a device link between drm device and panel device" >> >> To preserve bisectability, you should revert in the opposite order. > > You mean apply patch 2, then 1, then 3 so the kernel builds after each > revert? > > Yeah that's a good idea, I don't know if I should apply these though, better > someone else do it since I screwed up too much. > > Another option is to just squash the reverts into one, that bisects too :/
You can apply them now, or tell me if you want me to apply them.
Neil
> > Yours, > Linus Walleij
| |