Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Nov 2023 08:29:30 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: samsung: add irq_set_affinity() for non wake up external gpio interrupt | From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <> |
| |
On 28/11/2023 02:01, Youngmin Nam wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:54:56AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 26/11/2023 10:46, Youngmin Nam wrote: >>> To support affinity setting for non wake up external gpio interrupt, >>> add irq_set_affinity callback using irq number from pinctrl driver data. >>> >>> Before this patch, changing the irq affinity of gpio interrupt is not possible: >>> >>> # cat /proc/irq/418/smp_affinity >>> 3ff >>> # echo 00f > /proc/irq/418/smp_affinity >> >> Does this command succeed on your board? >> > Yes.
Hm, fails all the time one mine.
> >>> # cat /proc/irq/418/smp_affinity >>> 3ff >>> # cat /proc/interrupts >>> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 ... >>> 418: 3631 0 0 0 ... >>> >>> With this patch applied, it's possible to change irq affinity of gpio interrupt: >> >> ... >> >> On which board did you test it? >> >> > I tested on S5E9945 ERD(Exynos Reference Development) board.
There is no such board upstream. How can we reproduce this issue? I am afraid we cannot test neither the bug nor the fix.
> >>> + if (parent) >>> + return parent->chip->irq_set_affinity(parent, dest, force); >>> + >> >> I think there is a helper for it: irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(). >> >> > > The irq_chip_set_affinity_parent() requires parent_data of irq_data.
Hm, so now I wonder why do we not have parent_data...
> But when I tested as below, exynos's irqd->parent_data was null. > So we should use irqchip's affinity function instead of the helper function. >
Best regards, Krzysztof
| |