lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v7 00/10] Small-sized THP for anonymous memory
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 06:34:10PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 24.11.23 16:53, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > * we already have PMD-sized "large anon folios" in THP
> >
> > Right, those are already accounted as THP, and that's what users expect.
> > If we're allocating 1024 x 64kB chunks of memory, the user won't be able
> > to distinguish that from 32 x 2MB chunks of memory, and yet the
> > performance profile for some applications will be very different.
>
> Very right, and because there will be a difference between 1024 x 64kB, 2048
> x 32 kB and so forth, we need new memory stats either way.
>
> Ryan had some ideas on that, but currently, that's considered future work,
> just like it likely is for the pagecache as well and needs much more
> thoughts.
>
> Initially, the admin will have to enable all that for anon either way. It
> all boils down to one memory statistic for anon memory (AnonHugePages)
> that's messed-up already.

So we have FileHugePages which is very carefully only PMD-sized large
folios. If people start making AnonHugePages count non-PMD-sized
large folios, that's going to be inconsistent.

> > am objecting to the use of the term "small THP" on the grounds of
> > confusion and linguistic nonsense.
>
> Maybe that's the reason why FreeBSD calls them "medium-sized superpages",
> because "Medium-sized" seems to be more appropriate to express something "in
> between".

I don't mind "medium" in the name.

> So far I thought the reason was because they focused on 64k only.
>
> Never trust a German guy on naming suggestions. John has so far been my
> naming expert, so I'm hoping he can help.
>
> "Sub-pmd-sized THP" is just mouthful. But then, again, this is would just be
> a temporary name, and in the future THP will just naturally come in multiple
> sizes (and others here seem to agree on that).

I do not. If we'd come to this fifteen years ago, maybe, but people now
have an understanding that THPs are necessarily PMD sized.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-28 05:06    [W:1.105 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site