Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:18:46 +0800 | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page allocation on boot | From | Gang Li <> |
| |
On 2023/11/25 04:00, David Rientjes wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2023, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> And there, the 65.2s won't be noise because that 12TB system is up by a snap >> of a finger? :) >> > > In this single boot test, total boot time was 373.78s, so 1GB hugetlb > allocation is 17.4% of that.
Thank you for sharing these data. Currently, I don't have access to a machine of such large capacity, so the benefits in my tests are not as pronounced.
I believe testing on a system of this scale would yield significant benefits.
> > Would love to see what the numbers would look like if 1GB pages were > supported. >
Support for 1GB hugetlb is not yet perfect, so it wasn't included in v1. But I'm happy to refine and introduce 1GB hugetlb support in future versions.
| |