lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 17/20] d_alloc_parallel(): in-lookup hash insertion doesn't need an RCU variant
Date
We only search in the damn thing under hlist_bl_lock(); RCU variant
of insertion was, IIRC, pretty much cargo-culted - mea culpa...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/dcache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 440b46851f52..51e2f777a2c5 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -2690,7 +2690,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_parallel(struct dentry *parent,
/* we can't take ->d_lock here; it's OK, though. */
new->d_flags |= DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP;
new->d_wait = wq;
- hlist_bl_add_head_rcu(&new->d_u.d_in_lookup_hash, b);
+ hlist_bl_add_head(&new->d_u.d_in_lookup_hash, b);
hlist_bl_unlock(b);
return new;
mismatch:
--
2.39.2
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-24 07:19    [W:0.204 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site