lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 5/7] media: qcom: camss: Add support for named power-domains
From


On 11/22/23 21:55, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 22/11/2023 19:55, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/18/23 13:11, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>> Right now we use fixed indexes to assign power-domains, with a
>>> requirement for the TOP GDSC to come last in the list.
>>>
>>> Adding support for named power-domains means the declaration in the dtsi
>>> can come in any order.
>>>
>>> After this change we continue to support the old indexing - if a SoC
>>> resource declaration or the in-use dtb doesn't declare power-domain names
>>> we fall back to the default legacy indexing.
>>>
>>>  From this point on though new SoC additions should contain named
>>> power-domains, eventually we will drop support for legacy indexing.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>> So, this commit should be a NOP within this series?
>>
>> res->pd_name isn't defined anywhere afaics
>>
>> Konrad
>
> This series is mergeable though the linux-media tree standalone, yes.
>
> Once merged, the dtsi change given in the cover letter will be submitted.
What I meant to say is that something similar to [1] is missing to
make use of the infra introduced with this patch.

Konrad

[1] https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/commit/f43942091c01c1f263a6e7adbcd0ed8ce723a303

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-23 12:50    [W:0.048 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site