lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: imx6q: Only disabling 792MHz OPP for i.MX6ULL types below 792MHz
On 23-11-23, 12:58, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22-11-23, 14:41, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
> > For a 900MHz i.MX6ULL CPU the 792MHz OPP is disabled. There is no
> > convincing reason to disable this OPP. If a CPU can run at 900MHz,
> > it should also be able to cope with 792MHz. Looking at the voltage
> > level of 792MHz in [1] (page 24, table 10. "Operating Ranges") the
> > current defined OPP is above the minimum. So the voltage level
> > shouldn't be a problem. However in [2] (page 24, table 10.
> > "Operating Ranges"), it is not mentioned that 792MHz OPP isn't
> > allowed. Change it to only disable 792MHz OPP for i.MX6ULL types
> > below 792 MHz.
> >
> > [1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/IMX6ULLIEC.pdf
> > [2] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/IMX6ULLCEC.pdf
> >
> > Fixes: 0aa9abd4c212 ("cpufreq: imx6q: check speed grades for i.MX6ULL")
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
> > ---
> > V2: - Improve the commit message
> > - Add Fixes tag
> > - Add Reviewed-by tag
> > ---
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
> > Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
> > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> > Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
> > Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
> > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> > index 494d044b9e72..33728c242f66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
> > imx6x_disable_freq_in_opp(dev, 696000000);
> >
> > if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
> > - if (val != OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_792MHZ)
> > + if (val < OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_792MHZ)
> > imx6x_disable_freq_in_opp(dev, 792000000);
> >
> > if (val != OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_900MHZ)
>
> What about another similar check ?
>
> if (val != OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_900MHZ)

Yeah, that isn't required I guess.

Applied. Thanks.

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-23 08:34    [W:0.039 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site