lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Fwd: sign-file.c:149:17: warning: impli cit declaration of function ‘ENGINE load builtin en gines’
From
On 11/23/23 09:53, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 00:34 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> On 11/16/23 18:41, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I notice a bug report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
>>>
>> <snip>
>>>> Not related to
>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215750 but I *feel*
>>>> that this code needs a hug.
>>>
>>> See Bugzilla for the full thread.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, this looks like a bug when the kernel is compiled against
>>> custom (non-system) version of OpenSSL library.
>>>
>>
>> I do not know what you could possibly mean. There is nothing "custom"
>> about OpenSSL. For that matter the gcc compiler I am using was also
>> built by me. Works fine. The sign-file.c source compiles fine.
>
> This has all the hallmarks of an openssl compiled without engine
> support; is the symbol OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE set? And which distro did you
> get this library from?
>
> James
>

I am looking into this. The code will likely age into some deprecated
calls and I think that I may be way out on the edge here. However the
code will need a pile of ifndef stuff and then call the correct future
looking calls for OpenSSL 3.x etc etc etc ... the usual stuff

Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-24 00:49    [W:1.482 / U:1.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site