lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 6/9] slub: Delay freezing of partial slabs
From
On 11/22/23 15:28, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>
> Yes, it looks so. There are some background services on the 128 CPUs machine.
> Although "stress-ng --rawpkt 128 --rawpkt-ops 100000000" has so much regression,
> I tried other less contented testcases:
>
> 1. stress-ng --rawpkt 64 --rawpkt-ops 100000000
> 2. perf bench sched messaging -g 5 -t -l 100000
>
> The performance numbers of this atomic version are pretty much the same.
>
> So this atomic version should be good in most cases IMHO.

OK will fold the fix using full atomic version.

>>> And I also tested the atomic-optional version like below, found the
>>> performance numbers are much stable.
>>
>> This gets rather ugly and fragile so I'd maybe rather go back to the
>> __unused field approach :/
>>
>
> Agree. If we don't want this atomic version, the __unused field approach
> seems better.
>
> Thanks!
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-22 15:33    [W:0.064 / U:23.728 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site