lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: usb: ti,j721e-usb: add ti,j7200-usb compatible
From
Hello,

On Mon Nov 20, 2023 at 6:32 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/11/2023 18:06, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> > On this platform, the controller & its wrapper are reset on resume. This
> > makes it have a different behavior from other platforms.
> >
> > We allow using the new compatible with a fallback onto the original
> > ti,j721e-usb compatible. We therefore allow using an older kernel with
>
> Where is fallback ti,j721e-usb used? Please point me to the code.

No fallback is implemented in code. Using a kernel that doesn't have
this patch series but a more recent devicetree: DT has both
devicetrees & the kernel will know which driver to use.

That is opposed to having only compatible = "ti,j7200-usb". If using an
old kernel, it would not know what driver to match it to.

[...]

> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml
> > @@ -12,11 +12,15 @@ maintainers:
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > oneOf:
> > + - const: ti,j7200-usb
> > - const: ti,j721e-usb
> > - const: ti,am64-usb
> > - items:
> > - const: ti,j721e-usb
> > - const: ti,am64-usb
> > + - items:
> > + - const: ti,j721e-usb
>
> This makes little sense. It's already on the list. Twice! Don't add it
> third time.
>
> I am sorry, but this binding makes no sense. I mean, existing binding
> makes no sense, but your change is not making it anyhow better.

The goal of the DT schema pre-patch was to allow all three:

compatible = "ti,j721e-usb";
compatible = "ti,am64-usb";
compatible = "ti,j721e-usb", "ti,am64-usb";

I've followed the same scheme & added both of those:

compatible = "ti,j7200-usb";
compatible = "ti,j7200-usb", "ti,j721e-usb";

I messed up the ordering in the added 'items' options, but the logic
seems right to me. And dtbs_check agrees. Am I missing something?

Thanks,

--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-21 17:54    [W:0.049 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site