lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Mark PCIe EP controller as cache coherent
From

On 11/21/2023 8:25 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 08:08:13PM +0530, Mrinmay Sarkar wrote:
>> The PCIe EP controller on SA8775P supports cache coherency, hence add
>> the "dma-coherent" property to mark it as such.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@quicinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
>> index 7eab458..ab01efe 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p.dtsi
>> @@ -3620,6 +3620,7 @@
>> <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0 &config_noc SLAVE_PCIE_0 0>;
>> interconnect-names = "pcie-mem", "cpu-pcie";
>>
>> + dma-coherent;
>> iommus = <&pcie_smmu 0x0000 0x7f>;
>> resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_0_BCR>;
>> reset-names = "core";
> What tree is this against?
>
> Both controllers are already marked as dma-coherent in mainline so this
> patch makes no sense (and the context also looks wrong).
>
> It was even you added them apparently:
>
> 489f14be0e0a ("arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: Add pcie0 and pcie1 nodes")
>
> Johan
Hi Johan,

Yes both the RC controllers are dma-coherent and this change is for
PCIe EP controller and it is inside pcie0_ep node.
Actually the pcie0_ep node change is yet to apply on linux next.
I just made this change on top of that and the same I mentioned in
cover letter.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/1699669982-7691-6-git-send-email-quic_msarkar@quicinc.com/

Thanks,
Mrinmay

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-21 16:36    [W:0.040 / U:3.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site