lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: qcom: Enable cache coherency for SA8775P RC
From


On 02/11/2023 17:36, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:34:24PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 17:46, Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This change will enable cache snooping logic to support
>>> cache coherency for SA8755P RC platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>>> index 6902e97..6f240fc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
>>> #define PARF_SID_OFFSET 0x234
>>> #define PARF_BDF_TRANSLATE_CFG 0x24c
>>> #define PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE 0x358
>>> +#define PCIE_PARF_NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE 0x3d4
>>> #define PARF_DEVICE_TYPE 0x1000
>>> #define PARF_BDF_TO_SID_TABLE_N 0x2000
>>>
>>> @@ -117,6 +118,9 @@
>>> /* PARF_LTSSM register fields */
>>> #define LTSSM_EN BIT(8)
>>>
>>> +/* PARF_NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE register value */
>>> +#define NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE_EN 0xa
>>> +
>>> /* PARF_DEVICE_TYPE register fields */
>>> #define DEVICE_TYPE_RC 0x4
>>>
>>> @@ -961,6 +965,13 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>>>
>>> static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>>> {
>>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
>>> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
>>> +
>>> + /* Enable cache snooping for SA8775P */
>>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-sa8775p"))
>>
>> Obviously: please populate a flag in the data structures instead of
>> doing of_device_is_compatible(). Same applies to the patch 2.
>>
>
> Not necessary at this point. For some unknown reasons, the HW team ended up
> disabling cache snooping on this specific platform. Whereas on other platforms,
> it is enabled by default. So I have low expectations that we would need this
> setting on other platforms in the future.
>
> My concern with the usage of flag is that it warrants a new "qcom_pcie_cfg"
> instance just for this quirk and it looks overkill to me.
>
> So if we endup seeing this behavior on other platforms as well (unlikely) then
> we can switch to the flag approach.
This register reads zeroes on 8250, can we confirm it works as
expected there? I guess some benchmarks with and without
'dma-coherent'?

Konrad

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-11-02 23:26    [W:0.116 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site