Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 Nov 2023 06:58:18 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/191] 5.10.201-rc1 review | From | Guenter Roeck <> |
| |
On 11/16/23 23:41, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 06:43, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote: >> >> On 11/15/23 12:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.201 release. >>> There are 191 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:46:03 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >> >> Build results: >> total: 159 pass: 155 fail: 4 >> Failed builds: >> arm:allmodconfig >> arm64:allmodconfig >> i386:tools/perf >> x86_64:tools/perf >> Qemu test results: >> total: 495 pass: 495 fail: 0 >> >> with: >> >> Building arm64:allmodconfig ... failed >> -------------- >> Error log: >> drivers/interconnect/qcom/osm-l3.c:6:10: fatal error: linux/args.h: No such file or directory >> >> There is no linux/args.h in v5.10.y. >> >> Caused by "interconnect: qcom: osm-l3: Replace custom implementation of COUNT_ARGS()". >> >> Also: >> >> Building i386:tools/perf ... failed >> >> util/evlist.c: In function ‘evlist__add_aux_dummy’: >> util/evlist.c:269:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘evlist__dummy_event’; did you mean ‘evsel__is_dummy_event’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 269 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist); >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> | evsel__is_dummy_event >> util/evlist.c:269:24: error: initialization of ‘struct evsel *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer without a cast >> >> There is indeed no 'evlist__dummy_event' function in v5.10.y. >> >> This is with v5.10.200-192-g550b7e1fee20. I am a bit puzzled why others >> don't seem to see those problems. > > Thanks for reporting allmodconfig build failures. > > My apologies. > The LKFT found allmodconfig failure lately due to infra issues / timeouts, > the builds have been re-triggered manually. > > arm:allmodconfig - FAILED > arm64:allmodconfig - FAILED > > LKFT have stopped building perf on 5.x and 4.x branches, because we > reported several perf build issues and were not solved in the past. >
Kind of makes (sad) sense; after all, I had stopped building perf on 4.14.y as well for the same reason. I'll do the same for 4.19.y and for all 5.x branches.
Guenter
| |