Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:38:48 +0100 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] bpf: bpf_iter_task_next: use next_task(kit->task) rather than next_task(kit->pos) |
| |
On 11/16, Yonghong Song wrote: > > On 11/14/23 11:32 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >This looks more clear and simplifies the code. While at it, remove the > >unnecessary initialization of pos/task at the start of bpf_iter_task_new(). > > > >Note that we can even kill kit->task, we can just use pos->group_leader, > >but I don't understand the BUILD_BUG_ON() checks in bpf_iter_task_new(). > > Let us keep kit->task, which is used in later function > bpf_iter_task_next(). The patch looks good to me.
Yes, but it can use pos->group_leader instead of kit->task. But I agree, lets keep kit->task.
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Thanks!
Oleg.
| |