Messages in this thread | | | From | Huacai Chen <> | Date | Tue, 14 Nov 2023 10:25:40 +0800 | Subject | Re: drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) |
| |
Hi, Robin,
Could you please try this patch? https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/20231113032511.860159-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn/T/#u
Huacai
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:45 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote: > > On 2023-11-12 1:38 am, kernel test robot wrote: > > Hi Robin, > > > > First bad commit (maybe != root cause): > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > head: 3ca112b71f35dd5d99fc4571a56b5fc6f0c15814 > > commit: f9bd34e3753ea8f1433a3ba70f03a165a1416f98 perf/arm_cspmu: Clean up ACPI dependency > > date: 5 months ago > > config: loongarch-randconfig-r133-20231107 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231112/202311120926.cjYHyoYw-lkp@intel.com/config) > > compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 > > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231112/202311120926.cjYHyoYw-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311120926.cjYHyoYw-lkp@intel.com/ > > > > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * @@ > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * > > Unpicking the macros, I guess this must stem from: > > for_each_sibling_event() > -> lockdep_assert_event_ctx() > ->this_cpu_read(hardirqs_enabled) > > which appears to be the only obvious place to involve a __percpu pointer > in this area. > > From there it would seem to be a preexisting Loongarch bug - AFAICS > __percpu_read() (and presumably at least __percpu_write() as well) > should not be expecting a raw void * argument, but still the __percpu > pointer, since the final dereference is done right down in the asm using > the per-cpu offset stashed in r21? > > Thanks, > Robin. > > >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * @@ > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * > >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * @@ > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * > >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * @@ > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got unsigned int [noderef] __percpu * > >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got int [noderef] __percpu * @@ > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got int [noderef] __percpu * > >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got int [noderef] __percpu * @@ > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got int [noderef] __percpu * > >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got int [noderef] __percpu * @@ > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got int [noderef] __percpu * > >>> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *ptr @@ got int [noderef] __percpu * @@ > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: expected void *ptr > > drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c:627:9: sparse: got int [noderef] __percpu * > > > > vim +627 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c > > > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 609 > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 610 /* > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 611 * Make sure the group of events can be scheduled at once > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 612 * on the PMU. > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 613 */ > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 614 static bool arm_cspmu_validate_group(struct perf_event *event) > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 615 { > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 616 struct perf_event *sibling, *leader = event->group_leader; > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 617 struct arm_cspmu_hw_events fake_hw_events; > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 618 > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 619 if (event->group_leader == event) > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 620 return true; > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 621 > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 622 memset(&fake_hw_events, 0, sizeof(fake_hw_events)); > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 623 > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 624 if (!arm_cspmu_validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_hw_events, leader)) > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 625 return false; > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 626 > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 @627 for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) { > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 628 if (!arm_cspmu_validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_hw_events, > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 629 sibling)) > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 630 return false; > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 631 } > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 632 > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 633 return arm_cspmu_validate_event(event->pmu, &fake_hw_events, event); > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 634 } > > e37dfd65731dc4f Besar Wicaksono 2022-11-11 635 > > > > :::::: The code at line 627 was first introduced by commit > > :::::: e37dfd65731dc4f001fa7dfa7f705e6840017d5a perf: arm_cspmu: Add support for ARM CoreSight PMU driver > > > > :::::: TO: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com> > > :::::: CC: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> > >
| |