Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Oct 2023 12:06:18 +0300 | From | "" <> | Subject | Re: PPS functionality for Intel Timed I/O |
| |
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 10:57:37AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > On 06/10/23 10:34, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:34:10AM +0300, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 08:23:09AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > > > > On 06/10/23 07:31, N, Pandith wrote: > > > > > > From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 1:16 PM > > > > > > On 15/02/23 08:09, N, Pandith wrote:
[snip]
> > > > > > Regarding Documentation/driver-api/pps.rst let me suggest you to prose a > > > > > > separate patch to rewrite the Generators section in such a way you easily can add > > > > > > your solution at the end. A possible example is attached but feel free to rewrite it > > > > > > according to your needs. > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, we are updating documentation as you have suggested as a separate patch. > > > > > Can we use your "Signed-off-by" tag for attached patch. > > > > > > > > If you just followed my suggestion then it's OK for me. > > > > > > But can we have your SoB or not? If so, please provide it explicitly as > > > the (Linux kernel) process requires. > > > > Or even better if you provide the patch itself or apply directly to your tree > > that we can rebase the our stuff on. > > Just send the patch to the kernel mail list and, if OK, I'm going to sign it > and forwarding to Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Okay, now it's clear, thank you!
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |