Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Adrian Hunter <> | Subject | [PATCH 5/5] perf intel-pt: Prefer get_unaligned_le64 to memcpy_le64 | Date | Thu, 5 Oct 2023 22:04:51 +0300 |
| |
Use get_unaligned_le64() instead of memcpy_le64(..., 8) because it produces simpler code.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> --- tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c index 7a90218aecb1..bccb988a7a44 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-pkt-decoder.c @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_mnt(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len, if (len < 11) return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES; packet->type = INTEL_PT_MNT; - memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 3, 8); + packet->payload = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 3); return 11; } @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_bip_8(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len, return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES; packet->type = INTEL_PT_BIP; packet->count = buf[0] >> 3; - memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 1, 8); + packet->payload = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 1); return 9; } @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_evd(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len, packet->type = INTEL_PT_EVD; packet->count = buf[2] & 0x3f; packet->payload = buf[3]; - memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 3, 8); + packet->payload = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 3); return 11; } -- 2.34.1
| |