lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v4 00/18] net/smc: implement virtual ISM extension and loopback-ism
From


On 2023/9/29 21:31, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>
>
> On 28.09.23 19:29, Wen Gu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/9/28 16:56, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27.09.23 17:16, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>>>> Hello Wen Gu,
>>>>
>>>> I applied and built your patches and noticed some things that you may want to consider in the next version:
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI, patchwork basically complains about many the same issues:
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=787037&state=*
>>>
>>> In general you should run those check BEFORE you send the patches and not rely on patchwork.
>> Thank you Sandy. I seem to have not seen the specific content of these checks. May I ask how to
>> run those patchwork check locally? So that I can make sure everything is ok before send them.
>>
>
> Citing from Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst :
>
> "patchwork checks
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Checks in patchwork are mostly simple wrappers around existing kernel
> scripts, the sources are available at:
>
> https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/tree/master/tests
>
> **Do not** post your patches just to run them through the checks.
> You must ensure that your patches are ready by testing them locally
> before posting to the mailing list. The patchwork build bot instance
> gets overloaded very easily and netdev@vger really doesn't need more
> traffic if we can help it."
>
> HTH

Thank you! Sandy.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-10-04 10:43    [W:0.092 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site