Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:42:35 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/18] net/smc: implement virtual ISM extension and loopback-ism | From | Wen Gu <> |
| |
On 2023/9/29 21:31, Alexandra Winter wrote: > > > On 28.09.23 19:29, Wen Gu wrote: >> >> >> On 2023/9/28 16:56, Alexandra Winter wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 27.09.23 17:16, Alexandra Winter wrote: >>>> Hello Wen Gu, >>>> >>>> I applied and built your patches and noticed some things that you may want to consider in the next version: >>> >>> >>> FYI, patchwork basically complains about many the same issues: >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=787037&state=* >>> >>> In general you should run those check BEFORE you send the patches and not rely on patchwork. >> Thank you Sandy. I seem to have not seen the specific content of these checks. May I ask how to >> run those patchwork check locally? So that I can make sure everything is ok before send them. >> > > Citing from Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst : > > "patchwork checks > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Checks in patchwork are mostly simple wrappers around existing kernel > scripts, the sources are available at: > > https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/tree/master/tests > > **Do not** post your patches just to run them through the checks. > You must ensure that your patches are ready by testing them locally > before posting to the mailing list. The patchwork build bot instance > gets overloaded very easily and netdev@vger really doesn't need more > traffic if we can help it." > > HTH
Thank you! Sandy.
| |