Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Oct 2023 17:51:50 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review | From | Florian Fainelli <> |
| |
On 10/4/2023 1:19 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 12:33 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +Namhyung, Ian, >> >> On 10/4/23 10:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release. >>> There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >> >> perf fails to build with: >> >> fixdep: error opening depfile: >> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/pmu-events/.pmu-events.o.d: >> No such file or directory >> make[5]: *** [pmu-events/Build:33: >> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.o] >> Error 2 >> make[4]: *** [Makefile.perf:672: >> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-custom/tools/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events-in.o] >> Error 2 >> make[3]: *** [Makefile.perf:240: sub-make] Error 2 >> make[2]: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2 >> make[1]: *** [package/pkg-generic.mk:294: >> /local/users/fainelli/buildroot/output/arm/build/linux-tools/.stamp_built] >> Error 2 >> make: *** [Makefile:27: _all] Error 2 >> >> due a80fd00cb1a7793ead4d7c3fa7d3f1e898231c27 ("perf build: Update build >> rule for generated files"). Reverting that commit fixes the build for me >> and then all is good in terms of testing. > > I think it's ok to drop the patches if it's not applied > cleanly.
AFAICT the patch applied cleanly. There was some bizarre interplay in stable kernels prior to < 6.1 as reported here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/dcb9997a-2e8a-5eb2-7a34-f8af418d4bf1@gmail.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/6a577578-8adb-aa70-1bf8-b1a4573152cf@gmail.com/
Does this make sense to you that on 6.1 which does have Ian's commit 00facc760903be6675870c2749e2cd72140e396e ("perf jevents: Switch build to use jevents.py") that we would still get this build error somehow?
Thanks -- Florian
| |