Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Oct 2023 16:08:23 +0900 | From | AKASHI Takahiro <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for SCMI pinctrl based gpio |
| |
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 03:16:49PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > Hi Takahiro, > > first, thanks for working on this important and crucial driver! > > I'll try to clarify and also explain something of what the others > are saying (unless I misunderstand them...)
Ah, thank you.
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:17???AM AKASHI Takahiro > <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> wrote: > > > A dt binding for SCMI pinctrl based gpio driver is defined in this > > commit. It basically conforms to generic pinctrl-gpio mapping framework. > > > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> > > I think like Christian says that SCMI maybe has nothing to do > with this binding? It is just one possible use case (though we don't know > of any others.) The resource it is using is generic functionality that exist > in any pin controller that provides ways to drive lines high and low > etc. > > Would it be named a generic pin control-based GPIO?
If you like :) As I said, I was not confident that the driver be applicable to other pinctrl-gpio cases.
> (...) > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/arm,scmi-gpio.yaml > (...) > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/arm,scmi-gpio.yaml# > > So no ARM, no scmi, just pin-control-gpio.yaml, be bold!
I'm not so ambitious.
> (I like this long unabbreviated name) > > > +title: SCMI pinctrl based generic GPIO controller > > Pin control-based generic GPIO controller > > Add > > description: > The pin control-based GPIO will facilitate a pin controllers ability > to drive electric lines high/low and other generic properties of a > pin controller to perform general-purpose one-bit binary I/O. > > (At least I think this is the idea, I hope I understand correctly.)
Okay.
> > +properties: > > + $nodename: > > + pattern: "^scmi_gpio(@[0-9a-f]+)$" > > These nodes are always just named gpio@... > the resource marker is "this is a GPIO" that's all it means.
By following other gpio drivers' bindings, I will drop this rule.
> > + compatible: > > + const: arm,scmi-gpio-generic > > const: pin-control-gpio > > Other than that I am aboard with the solution!
Hope that the driver works on real hardware :)
-Takahiro Akashi
> Yours, > Linus Walleij
| |