lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH net v2] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Bump min packet size
From


On 10/30/2023 5:37 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 01:09:06AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:57:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> This of course make no sense, since the padding function should do nothing
>>> when the packet is bigger than 60 bytes.
>>
>> Indeed, this of course makes no sense. Ping doesn't work, or ARP doesn't
>> work? Could you add a static ARP entry for the 192.168.1.137 IP address?
>
> Probably the ARP, since they are short packets and probably need the
> padding.

Does this also mean that there is a general problem with unicast
packets, and that broadcast packets happen to work by accident? Could
you check whether a broadcast ping (ping -b) size sweep is immune to
what you are reporting?
--
Florian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-10-31 04:39    [W:0.172 / U:1.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site