Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Oct 2023 04:30:26 +0800 | From | kernel test robot <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64/entry-common: Make Aarch32 syscalls' availability depend on aarch32_enabled() |
| |
Hi Andrea,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core] [also build test WARNING on arm-perf/for-next/perf arm/for-next arm/fixes kvmarm/next soc/for-next linus/master v6.6-rc6 next-20231020] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrea-della-Porta/arm64-Introduce-aarch32_enabled/20231018-191517 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/88bdea628a13747bff32c0c3055d6d6ef7264d96.1697614386.git.andrea.porta%40suse.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/4] arm64/entry-common: Make Aarch32 syscalls' availability depend on aarch32_enabled() config: arm64-randconfig-003-20231023 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231023/202310230423.r2U4Lqr8-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231023/202310230423.r2U4Lqr8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310230423.r2U4Lqr8-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:805:11: warning: no previous prototype for 'el0t_32_sync_ni_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 805 | UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, sync_ni) | ^~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:302:25: note: in definition of macro 'UNHANDLED' 302 | asmlinkage void noinstr el##_##regsize##_##vector##_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) \ | ^~ >> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:806:11: warning: no previous prototype for 'el0t_32_irq_ni_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 806 | UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, irq_ni) | ^~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:302:25: note: in definition of macro 'UNHANDLED' 302 | asmlinkage void noinstr el##_##regsize##_##vector##_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) \ | ^~ >> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:807:11: warning: no previous prototype for 'el0t_32_fiq_ni_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 807 | UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, fiq_ni) | ^~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:302:25: note: in definition of macro 'UNHANDLED' 302 | asmlinkage void noinstr el##_##regsize##_##vector##_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) \ | ^~ >> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:808:11: warning: no previous prototype for 'el0t_32_error_ni_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 808 | UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, error_ni) | ^~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:302:25: note: in definition of macro 'UNHANDLED' 302 | asmlinkage void noinstr el##_##regsize##_##vector##_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) \ | ^~
vim +/el0t_32_sync_ni_handler +805 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
803 804 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > 805 UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, sync_ni) > 806 UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, irq_ni) > 807 UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, fiq_ni) > 808 UNHANDLED(el0t, 32, error_ni) 809
-- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
| |