Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Oct 2023 18:13:34 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH memory-model] docs: memory-barriers: Add note on compiler transformation and address deps | From | Jonas Oberhauser <> |
| |
Am 10/20/2023 um 5:24 PM schrieb Akira Yokosawa: > Hi Paul, > > On 2023/10/20 22:57, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > [...] >> So if there are things that rcu_dereference.rst is missing, they do >> need to be added. > As far as I can see, there is no mention of "address dependency" > in rcu_dereference.rst. > Yes, I see the discussion in rcu_dereference.rst is all about how > not to break address dependency by proper uses of rcu_dereference() > and its friends. But that might not be obvious for readers who > followed the references placed in memory-barriers.txt. > > Using the term "address dependency" somewhere in rcu_dereference.rst > should help such readers, I guess.
I think that's a good point.
> > [...] >>> Thanks for the response, I started thinking my mails aren't getting through >>> again. > Jonas, FWIW, your email archived at > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/1c731fdc-9383-21f2-b2d0-2c879b382687@huaweicloud.com/ > > didn't reach my gmail inbox. I looked for it in the spam folder, > but couldn't find it there either. > > Your first reply on Oct 6, which is archived at > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/4110a58a-8db5-57c4-2f5a-e09ee054baaa@huaweicloud.com/ > > ended up in my spam folder. > > I have no idea why gmail has trouble with your emails so often ... > > Anyway, LKML did accept your mails this time. > > HTH, > Akira
Thanks Akira!
I wrote the gmail support a while ago, but no response.
Currently no idea who to talk to... Oh well.
| |