Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 20 Oct 2023 18:27:19 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | [for-next][PATCH 6/6] seq_buf: fix a misleading comment |
| |
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
The comment for seq_buf_has_overflowed() says that an overflow condition is marked by len == size, but that's not what the code is testing. Make the comment match reality.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87pm19kp0m.fsf@meer.lwn.net
Fixes: 8cd709ae7658a ("tracing: Have seq_buf use full buffer") Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> --- include/linux/seq_buf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h index a0fb013cebdf..8483e4b2d0d2 100644 --- a/include/linux/seq_buf.h +++ b/include/linux/seq_buf.h @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ seq_buf_init(struct seq_buf *s, char *buf, unsigned int size) /* * seq_buf have a buffer that might overflow. When this happens - * the len and size are set to be equal. + * len is set to be greater than size. */ static inline bool seq_buf_has_overflowed(struct seq_buf *s) -- 2.42.0
| |