Messages in this thread | | | From | Ard Biesheuvel <> | Date | Tue, 17 Oct 2023 17:36:30 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2] efi/unaccepted: Fix soft lockups caused by parallel memory acceptance |
| |
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 12:17, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 09:42:13AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > One question I have is whether the sequence > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&unaccepted_memory_lock, flags); > > ... > > spin_unlock(&unaccepted_memory_lock); > > arch_accept_memory(phys_start, phys_end); > > spin_lock(&unaccepted_memory_lock); > > ... > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&unaccepted_memory_lock, flags); > > > > is considered sound and is supported by all architectures? > > Yes.
Thanks for the clarification
I've queued this up now (with the cpu_relax() removed)
| |