lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v15 00/11] LSM: Three basic syscalls
    On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 8:05 AM Roberto Sassu
    <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
    >
    > Sorry, I just noticed LSM_ID_IMA. Since we have the 'integrity' LSM, I
    > think it should be LSM_ID_INTEGRITY.
    >
    > Mimi, all, do you agree? If yes, I send a patch shortly.

    I believe LSM_ID_IMA is the better option, despite "integrity" already
    being present in Kconfig and possibly other areas. "IMA" is a
    specific thing/LSM whereas "integrity" is a property, principle, or
    quality. Especially as we move forward with promoting IMA as a full
    and proper LSM, we should work towards referring to it as "IMA" and
    not "integrity".

    If anything we should be working to support "IMA" in places where we
    currently have "integrity" so that we can eventually deprecate
    "integrity".

    --
    paul-moore.com

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2023-10-16 17:07    [W:8.814 / U:0.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site