Messages in this thread | | | From | Namhyung Kim <> | Date | Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:21:09 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf symbols: Add 'intel_idle_ibrs' to the list of idle symbols |
| |
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 10:16 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hi Arnaldo, > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 6:29 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> > > > > This is a longstanding to do list entry: we need a way to see that a > > sample took place while in idle state, as the current way to do it is > > to infer that by the name of the functions that in such state have > > more samples, IOW: a hack. > > > > Maybe we can do flip a bit in samples that take place inside the > > enter/exit idle section in do_idle()? > > > > But till then, add one more :-\ > > > > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> > > cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> > > Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, > > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> > > Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
| |