lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 net] net/smc: fix smc clc failed issue when netdevice not in init_net
From


On 11.10.23 09:48, Albert Huang wrote:
> If the netdevice is within a container and communicates externally
> through network technologies such as VxLAN, we won't be able to find
> routing information in the init_net namespace. To address this issue,
> we need to add a struct net parameter to the smc_ib_find_route function.
> This allow us to locate the routing information within the corresponding
> net namespace, ensuring the correct completion of the SMC CLC interaction.
>
> Fixes: e5c4744cfb59 ("net/smc: add SMC-Rv2 connection establishment")
> Signed-off-by: Albert Huang <huangjie.albert@bytedance.com>
> ---
> net/smc/af_smc.c | 3 ++-
> net/smc/smc_ib.c | 7 ++++---
> net/smc/smc_ib.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index bacdd971615e..7a874da90c7f 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
> (struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *)aclc;
> struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce =
> smc_get_clc_first_contact_ext(clc_v2, false);
> + struct net *net = sock_net(&smc->sk);
> int rc;
>
> if (!ini->first_contact_peer || aclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1)
> @@ -1210,7 +1211,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc,
> memcpy(ini->smcrv2.nexthop_mac, &aclc->r0.lcl.mac, ETH_ALEN);
> ini->smcrv2.uses_gateway = false;
> } else {
> - if (smc_ib_find_route(smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr,
> + if (smc_ib_find_route(net, smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcv_saddr,
> smc_ib_gid_to_ipv4(aclc->r0.lcl.gid),
> ini->smcrv2.nexthop_mac,
> &ini->smcrv2.uses_gateway))
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.c b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> index 9b66d6aeeb1a..89981dbe46c9 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ bool smc_ib_port_active(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport)
> return smcibdev->pattr[ibport - 1].state == IB_PORT_ACTIVE;
> }
>
> -int smc_ib_find_route(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> +int smc_ib_find_route(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> u8 nexthop_mac[], u8 *uses_gateway)
> {
> struct neighbour *neigh = NULL;
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ int smc_ib_find_route(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
>
> if (daddr == cpu_to_be32(INADDR_NONE))
> goto out;
> - rt = ip_route_output_flow(&init_net, &fl4, NULL);
> + rt = ip_route_output_flow(net, &fl4, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(rt))
> goto out;
> if (rt->rt_uses_gateway && rt->rt_gw_family != AF_INET)
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ static int smc_ib_determine_gid_rcu(const struct net_device *ndev,
> if (smcrv2 && attr->gid_type == IB_GID_TYPE_ROCE_UDP_ENCAP &&
> smc_ib_gid_to_ipv4((u8 *)&attr->gid) != cpu_to_be32(INADDR_NONE)) {
> struct in_device *in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(ndev);
> + struct net *net = dev_net(ndev);
> const struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
> bool subnet_match = false;
>
> @@ -248,7 +249,7 @@ static int smc_ib_determine_gid_rcu(const struct net_device *ndev,
> }
> if (!subnet_match)
> goto out;
> - if (smcrv2->daddr && smc_ib_find_route(smcrv2->saddr,
> + if (smcrv2->daddr && smc_ib_find_route(net, smcrv2->saddr,
> smcrv2->daddr,
> smcrv2->nexthop_mac,
> &smcrv2->uses_gateway))
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.h b/net/smc/smc_ib.h
> index 4df5f8c8a0a1..ef8ac2b7546d 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_ib.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.h
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ void smc_ib_sync_sg_for_device(struct smc_link *lnk,
> int smc_ib_determine_gid(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport,
> unsigned short vlan_id, u8 gid[], u8 *sgid_index,
> struct smc_init_info_smcrv2 *smcrv2);
> -int smc_ib_find_route(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> +int smc_ib_find_route(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> u8 nexthop_mac[], u8 *uses_gateway);
> bool smc_ib_is_valid_local_systemid(void);
> int smcr_nl_get_device(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb);

If it works for VXLAN, I'm still wondering why this case doesn't work,
could you please answer it?
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/00bbbf48440c1889ecd16a590ebb746b820a4f48.camel@linux.ibm.com/


Thanks,
Wenjia

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-10-11 16:34    [W:0.095 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site