Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:57:02 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v12 04/10] x86/resctrl: Add comments on RFTYPE flags hierarchy | From | "Moger, Babu" <> |
| |
Hi Reinette,
On 10/10/23 19:56, Reinette Chatre wrote: > Hi Babu, > > On 10/10/2023 4:33 PM, Babu Moger wrote: >> resctrl uses RFTYPE flags for creating resctrl directory structure. >> >> Definitions and directory structures are not documented. Add >> comments to improve the readability and help future additions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> >> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> >> Tested-by: Tan Shaopeng <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> >> Reviewed-by: Tan Shaopeng <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> >> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> v12: Moved the comments from arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h >> to Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst. (Boris) >> --- > > It seems like you just copied the text to the documentation without > taking into account the destination's use of reST syntax. > > I tried a "make htmldocs" to see how this looks but encountered: > docutils.utils.SystemMessage: [snip]/linux/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst:398: (SEVERE/4) Unexpected section title.
My bad. Just tested the format by opening using the browser. Forgot about make htmldocs. Will fix it now. > > Please remove my Reviewed-by.
Sure. Will remove Reviewed-by on this patch. Please let me know about other patches when you get a chance. -- Thanks Babu Moger
| |