Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Jan 2023 17:33:33 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: fix inactive_task_timer splat with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT |
| |
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 03:17:01PM -0300, Wander Lairson Costa wrote: > inactive_task_timer() executes in interrupt (atomic) context. It calls > put_task_struct(), which indirectly acquires sleeping locks under > PREEMPT_RT. > > Below is an example of a splat that happened in a test environment: > > CPU: 1 PID: 2848 Comm: life Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W --------- > Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL388p Gen8, BIOS P70 07/15/2012 > Call Trace: > dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d > mark_lock_irq.cold+0x33/0xba > ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 > ? save_trace+0x55/0x150 > mark_lock+0x1e7/0x400 > mark_usage+0x11d/0x140 > __lock_acquire+0x30d/0x930 > lock_acquire.part.0+0x9c/0x210 > ? refill_obj_stock+0x3d/0x3a0 > ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70 > ? trace_lock_acquire+0x38/0x140 > ? lock_acquire+0x30/0x80 > ? refill_obj_stock+0x3d/0x3a0 > rt_spin_lock+0x27/0xe0 > ? refill_obj_stock+0x3d/0x3a0 > refill_obj_stock+0x3d/0x3a0 > ? inactive_task_timer+0x1ad/0x340 > kmem_cache_free+0x357/0x560 > inactive_task_timer+0x1ad/0x340 > ? switched_from_dl+0x2d0/0x2d0 > __run_hrtimer+0x8a/0x1a0 > __hrtimer_run_queues+0x91/0x130 > hrtimer_interrupt+0x10f/0x220 > __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7b/0xd0 > sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4f/0xd0 > ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa/0x20 > asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 > RIP: 0033:0x7fff196bf6f5 > > Instead of calling put_task_struct() directly, we defer it using > call_rcu(). A more natural approach would use a workqueue, but since > in PREEMPT_RT, we can't allocate dynamic memory from atomic context, > the code would become more complex because we would need to put the > work_struct instance in the task_struct and initialize it when we > allocate a new task_struct. > > Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com> > Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > --- > kernel/sched/build_policy.c | 1 + > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/build_policy.c b/kernel/sched/build_policy.c > index d9dc9ab3773f..f159304ee792 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/build_policy.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/build_policy.c > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > #include <linux/suspend.h> > #include <linux/tsacct_kern.h> > #include <linux/vtime.h> > +#include <linux/rcupdate.h> > > #include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c > index 9ae8f41e3372..ab9301d4cc24 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c > @@ -1405,6 +1405,13 @@ static void update_curr_dl(struct rq *rq) > } > } > > +static void delayed_put_task_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp) > +{ > + struct task_struct *task = container_of(rhp, struct task_struct, rcu); > + > + __put_task_struct(task);
Please note that BH is disabled here. Don't you therefore need to schedule a workqueue handler? Perhaps directly from inactive_task_timer(), or maybe from this point. If the latter, one way to skip the extra step is to use queue_rcu_work().
Thanx, Paul
> +} > + > static enum hrtimer_restart inactive_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) > { > struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = container_of(timer, > @@ -1442,7 +1449,22 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart inactive_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) > dl_se->dl_non_contending = 0; > unlock: > task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); > - put_task_struct(p); > + > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) { > + /* > + * Decrement the refcount explicitly to avoid unnecessarily > + * calling call_rcu. > + */ > + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&p->usage)) > + /* > + * under PREEMPT_RT, we can't call put_task_struct > + * in atomic context because it will indirectly > + * acquire sleeping locks. > + */ > + call_rcu(&p->rcu, delayed_put_task_struct); > + } else { > + put_task_struct(p); > + } > > return HRTIMER_NORESTART; > } > -- > 2.39.0 >
| |