lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/3] mfd: ax20x: Add suppport for AXP1530 PMIC


On Tue, Jan 10 2023 at 12:00:25 AM +00:00:00, Andre Przywara
<andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 01:13:01 +0100
> Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
Hello Andre,
>
> hope you had a good break! Did you have any chance to come back to
> this
> again? Now would be a good time to send a new version, otherwise it's
> getting pretty tight for v6.3 already.
>
I did have a good break :)
I unfortunately did not. Was bit busy with issues to one of my projects.
Will see if I can sort this out tomorrow but you said you already have
AXP313A driver
ready. So it may be better if you send your driver.
> On Friday, "junari" in the #linux-sunxi IRC channel, made some
> interesting discovery: he is playing around with an AXP313a on some
> H616 device and figured that DCDC3 is not behaving like the datasheet:
> https://oftc.irclog.whitequark.org/linux-sunxi/2023-01-06#31784528;
> He later confirmed the voltage:
> https://oftc.irclog.whitequark.org/linux-sunxi/2023-01-08#31788373;
>
Ah interesting. What i also found out right after signing off is from a
friend at BIQU
that the AXP1530 is the AXP313A. It is the same chip. The only
difference being that AXP1530
is the internal naming AXP uses. I mean we kinda figured that one out
but its nice to have
confirmation on this :)
> Basically it looks like the DCDC3 parameters you harvested from the
> BSP
> code seem to be correct after all. Do you have any chance to measure
> the voltage?
I wish i had. Dont think my multimeter would be able to be so precise.
Will try to source some oscilloscope but that wont be in time
unfortunately.
> If not, can we try to deduce what the right settings are? The voltage
> difference seems to be significant (860mV vs 1200mV), I wonder if any
> device connected there (DRAM?) would work with the wrong setting?
I will try to be around in IRC sunxi channel "today" from around
13:00UTC+1.
Would be prob best to discuss this there and then share our findings
here on LKML :)

Cheers,
Martin
>
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
>> On December 16, 2022 7:17:52 PM GMT+01:00, Andre Przywara
>> <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>> >On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 20:03:04 +0100
>> >Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >Hi Martin,
>> >
>> >> AXP1530 is a PMIC chip produced by X-Powers and an be connected
>> via
>> >> I2C bus.
>> >> Where AXP313A seems to be closely related so the same driver can
>> be used and
>> >> seen it only paired with H616 SoC.
>> >
>> >So as mentioned, I am pretending this is for the AXP313A now,
>> looking at
>> >its datasheet.
>> >Of course the elephant in the room is s/AXP1530/AXP313A/, but
>> other than
>> >that:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@somainline.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c | 2 ++
>> >> drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 62
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
>> >> index 8fd6727dc30a..6bfb931a580e 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x-i2c.c
>> >> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static void axp20x_i2c_remove(struct
>> i2c_client *i2c)
>> >> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> >> static const struct of_device_id axp20x_i2c_of_match[] = {
>> >> { .compatible = "x-powers,axp152", .data = (void *)AXP152_ID },
>> >> + { .compatible = "x-powers,axp1530", .data = (void
>> *)AXP1530_ID},
>> >> { .compatible = "x-powers,axp202", .data = (void *)AXP202_ID },
>> >> { .compatible = "x-powers,axp209", .data = (void *)AXP209_ID },
>> >> { .compatible = "x-powers,axp221", .data = (void *)AXP221_ID },
>> >> @@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, axp20x_i2c_of_match);
>> >>
>> >> static const struct i2c_device_id axp20x_i2c_id[] = {
>> >> { "axp152", 0 },
>> >> + { "axp1530", 0 },
>> >> { "axp202", 0 },
>> >> { "axp209", 0 },
>> >> { "axp221", 0 },
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
>> >> index 880c41fa7021..6caa7e87ad80 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
>> >> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>> >>
>> >> static const char * const axp20x_model_names[] = {
>> >> "AXP152",
>> >> + "AXP1530",
>> >> "AXP202",
>> >> "AXP209",
>> >> "AXP221",
>> >> @@ -66,6 +67,24 @@ static const struct regmap_access_table
>> axp152_volatile_table = {
>> >> .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(axp152_volatile_ranges),
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> +static const struct regmap_range axp1530_writeable_ranges[] = {
>> >> + regmap_reg_range(AXP1530_ON_INDICATE, AXP1530_FREQUENCY),
>> >
>> >Where does this FREQUENCY register come from? BSP source? Is that
>> the
>> >lost register to set the PWM frequency?
>> >The 313 datasheet doesn't mention it, and since we deny
>> programming the
>> >frequency, I would just leave it out.
>> >If people find it existing (and useful!) later on, we should be
>> able to
>> >add it without breaking anything.
>>
>> BSP. Ack.
>> >
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const struct regmap_range axp1530_volatile_ranges[] = {
>> >> + regmap_reg_range(AXP1530_ON_INDICATE, AXP1530_FREQUENCY),
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const struct regmap_access_table axp1530_writeable_table
>> = {
>> >> + .yes_ranges = axp1530_writeable_ranges,
>> >> + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(axp1530_writeable_ranges),
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const struct regmap_access_table axp1530_volatile_table
>> = {
>> >> + .yes_ranges = axp1530_volatile_ranges,
>> >> + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(axp1530_volatile_ranges),
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> static const struct regmap_range axp20x_writeable_ranges[] = {
>> >> regmap_reg_range(AXP20X_DATACACHE(0), AXP20X_IRQ5_STATE),
>> >> regmap_reg_range(AXP20X_CHRG_CTRL1, AXP20X_CHRG_CTRL2),
>> >> @@ -245,6 +264,15 @@ static const struct regmap_config
>> axp152_regmap_config = {
>> >> .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> +static const struct regmap_config axp1530_regmap_config = {
>> >> + .reg_bits = 8,
>> >> + .val_bits = 8,
>> >> + .wr_table = &axp1530_writeable_table,
>> >> + .volatile_table = &axp1530_volatile_table,
>> >> + .max_register = AXP1530_FREQUENCY,
>> >> + .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> static const struct regmap_config axp20x_regmap_config = {
>> >> .reg_bits = 8,
>> >> .val_bits = 8,
>> >> @@ -304,6 +332,16 @@ static const struct regmap_irq
>> axp152_regmap_irqs[] = {
>> >> INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP152, GPIO0_INPUT, 2, 0),
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> +static const struct regmap_irq axp1530_regmap_irqs[] = {
>> >> + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP1530, KEY_L2H_EN, 0, 7),
>> >> + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP1530, KEY_H2L_EN, 0, 6),
>> >> + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP1530, POKSIRQ_EN, 0, 5),
>> >> + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP1530, POKLIRQ_EN, 0, 4),
>> >
>> >Are those identifiers from the BSP source? The (translated) manual
>> gives
>> >some explanation, namely:
>> > PWRON key rising edge
>> > PWRON key falling edge
>> > Short press the PWRON button
>> > Long press the PWRON button
>> >
>> >So I'd suggest we follow the existing naming:
>> > PEK_RIS_EDGE, PEK_FAL_EDGE, PEK_SHORT, PEK_LONG (respectively)
>> >
>> >Or come up with names that people could actually decipher ;-)
>> >
>> >
>> Ack.
>> >> + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP1530, DCDC3_UNDER, 0, 3),
>> >> + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP1530, DCDC2_UNDER, 0, 2),
>> >> + INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP1530, TEMP_OVER, 0, 0),
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> static const struct regmap_irq axp20x_regmap_irqs[] = {
>> >> INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP20X, ACIN_OVER_V, 0, 7),
>> >> INIT_REGMAP_IRQ(AXP20X, ACIN_PLUGIN, 0, 6),
>> >> @@ -514,6 +552,18 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip
>> axp152_regmap_irq_chip = {
>> >> .num_regs = 3,
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> +static const struct regmap_irq_chip axp1530_regmap_irq_chip = {
>> >> + .name = "axp1530_irq_chip",
>> >> + .status_base = AXP1530_IRQ_STATUS1,
>> >> + .ack_base = AXP1530_IRQ_STATUS1,
>> >> + .mask_base = AXP1530_IRQ_ENABLE1,
>> >> + .mask_invert = true,
>> >> + .init_ack_masked = true,
>> >> + .irqs = axp1530_regmap_irqs,
>> >> + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(axp1530_regmap_irqs),
>> >> + .num_regs = 1,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> static const struct regmap_irq_chip axp20x_regmap_irq_chip = {
>> >> .name = "axp20x_irq_chip",
>> >> .status_base = AXP20X_IRQ1_STATE,
>> >> @@ -683,6 +733,12 @@ static const struct mfd_cell axp152_cells[]
>> = {
>> >> },
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> +static struct mfd_cell axp1530_cells[] = {
>> >> + {
>> >> + .name = "axp20x-regulator",
>> >> + },
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> static const struct resource axp288_adc_resources[] = {
>> >> DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP288_IRQ_GPADC, "GPADC"),
>> >> };
>> >> @@ -874,6 +930,12 @@ int axp20x_match_device(struct axp20x_dev
>> *axp20x)
>> >> axp20x->regmap_cfg = &axp152_regmap_config;
>> >> axp20x->regmap_irq_chip = &axp152_regmap_irq_chip;
>> >> break;
>> >> + case AXP1530_ID:
>> >> + axp20x->nr_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(axp1530_cells);
>> >> + axp20x->cells = axp1530_cells;
>> >> + axp20x->regmap_cfg = &axp1530_regmap_config;
>> >> + axp20x->regmap_irq_chip = &axp1530_regmap_irq_chip;
>> >> + break;
>> >> case AXP202_ID:
>> >> case AXP209_ID:
>> >> axp20x->nr_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_cells);
>> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
>> b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
>> >> index 9ab0e2fca7ea..cad25754500f 100644
>> >> --- a/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
>> >> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h
>> >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>> >>
>> >> enum axp20x_variants {
>> >> AXP152_ID = 0,
>> >> + AXP1530_ID,
>> >> AXP202_ID,
>> >> AXP209_ID,
>> >> AXP221_ID,
>> >> @@ -45,6 +46,18 @@ enum axp20x_variants {
>> >> #define AXP152_DCDC_FREQ 0x37
>> >> #define AXP152_DCDC_MODE 0x80
>> >>
>> >> +#define AXP1530_ON_INDICATE 0x00
>> >> +#define AXP1530_OUTPUT_CONTROL 0x10
>> >> +#define AXP1530_DCDC1_CONRTOL 0x13
>> >> +#define AXP1530_DCDC2_CONRTOL 0x14
>> >> +#define AXP1530_DCDC3_CONRTOL 0x15
>> >> +#define AXP1530_ALDO1_CONRTOL 0x16
>> >> +#define AXP1530_DLDO1_CONRTOL 0x17
>> >> +#define AXP1530_OUTOUT_MONITOR 0x1D
>> >
>> >Shall this read AXP1530_OUTPUT_MONITOR?
>> >
>> >> +#define AXP1530_IRQ_ENABLE1 0x20
>> >> +#define AXP1530_IRQ_STATUS1 0x21
>> >
>> >There is only one interrupt register, so can we drop the trailing
>> number?
>> >
>> Yep.
>> >> +#define AXP1530_FREQUENCY 0x87
>> >
>> >As mentioned, the manual does not mention it, and we don't use it
>> anyway.
>> >
>> Ack.
>> >> +
>> >> #define AXP20X_PWR_INPUT_STATUS 0x00
>> >> #define AXP20X_PWR_OP_MODE 0x01
>> >> #define AXP20X_USB_OTG_STATUS 0x02
>> >> @@ -287,6 +300,15 @@ enum axp20x_variants {
>> >> #define AXP288_FG_TUNE5 0xed
>> >>
>> >> /* Regulators IDs */
>> >> +enum {
>> >> + AXP1530_DCDC1 = 0,
>> >> + AXP1530_DCDC2,
>> >> + AXP1530_DCDC3,
>> >> + AXP1530_LDO1,
>> >> + AXP1530_LDO2,
>> >
>> >I guess we should add the RTC LDO as LDO3 here.
>> >
>> >The rest of the numbers match with the datasheet.
>> >
>> Ack.
>>
>> I will take some time off due to Uni so v6 will be delayed peobably
>> last holidays.
>>
>> Best regards and happy holidays,
>> Martin
>> >Cheers,
>> >Andre
>> >
>> >> + AXP1530_REG_ID_MAX,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> enum {
>> >> AXP20X_LDO1 = 0,
>> >> AXP20X_LDO2,
>> >> @@ -440,6 +462,16 @@ enum {
>> >> AXP152_IRQ_GPIO0_INPUT,
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> +enum axp1530_irqs {
>> >> + AXP1530_IRQ_TEMP_OVER,
>> >> + AXP1530_IRQ_DCDC2_UNDER = 2,
>> >> + AXP1530_IRQ_DCDC3_UNDER,
>> >> + AXP1530_IRQ_POKLIRQ_EN,
>> >> + AXP1530_IRQ_POKSIRQ_EN,
>> >> + AXP1530_IRQ_KEY_L2H_EN,
>> >> + AXP1530_IRQ_KEY_H2L_EN,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> enum {
>> >> AXP20X_IRQ_ACIN_OVER_V = 1,
>> >> AXP20X_IRQ_ACIN_PLUGIN,
>> >
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:34    [W:0.049 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site