lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: dts: fsd: Add codec node for Tesla FSD
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org]
> Sent: 03 January 2023 04:41 PM
> To: Padmanabhan Rajanbabu <p.rajanbabu@samsung.com>;
> lgirdwood@gmail.com; broonie@kernel.org; robh+dt@kernel.org;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; s.nawrocki@samsung.com;
> perex@perex.cz; tiwai@suse.com; pankaj.dubey@samsung.com;
> alim.akhtar@samsung.com; rcsekar@samsung.com;
> aswani.reddy@samsung.com
> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: dts: fsd: Add codec node for Tesla FSD
>
> On 03/01/2023 05:56, Padmanabhan Rajanbabu wrote:
> > Add device tree node support for codec on Tesla FSD platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Padmanabhan Rajanbabu <p.rajanbabu@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> > index cf5f2ce4d2a7..e2fd49774f15 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >
> > /dts-v1/;
> > #include "fsd.dtsi"
> > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> >
> > / {
> > model = "Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) Evaluation board"; @@ -34,6
> > +35,18 @@
> > clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> > };
> >
> > +&hsi2c_5 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + tlv320aic3x: codec@18 {
> > + #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
> > + compatible = "ti,tlv320aic3104";
> > + reg = <0x18>;
>
> First compatible, then reg, then the rest.

Okay, I'll update the same in the next patch set.

>
> > + reset-gpios = <&gpg1 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > + status = "okay";
>
> It's by default. Why do you need it?

Okay, I understood that if there is no status entry, it is
treated as "okay". I'll update the same in the next
patch set.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thanks,
Padmanabhan R.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:32    [W:0.098 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site