Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 05 Jan 2023 16:09:13 +0100 | From | Michael Walle <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: lan966x: Add ptp trap rules |
| |
Hi,
>> Also, if the answer to my question above is yes, and ptp should >> have worked on eth0 before, this is a regression then. > > OK, I can see your point. > With the following diff, you should see the same behaviour as before: > --- > diff --git > a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_vcap_impl.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_vcap_impl.c > index 904f5a3f636d3..538f4b76cf97a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_vcap_impl.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_vcap_impl.c > @@ -91,8 +91,6 @@ lan966x_vcap_is2_get_port_keysets(struct net_device > *dev, int lookup, > > /* Check if the port keyset selection is enabled */ > val = lan_rd(lan966x, ANA_VCAP_S2_CFG(port->chip_port)); > - if (!ANA_VCAP_S2_CFG_ENA_GET(val)) > - return -ENOENT; > > /* Collect all keysets for the port in a list */ > if (l3_proto == ETH_P_ALL)
Any news on this? Apart from the patches which would change the need to use some tc magic, this should be a separate fixes patch, right?
-michael
| |