lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/2] tools/resolve_btfids: Alter how HOSTCC is forced
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:25:38AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:08 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 9:21 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ian,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:43:24PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > HOSTCC is always wanted when building. Setting CC to HOSTCC happens
> > > > after tools/scripts/Makefile.include is included, meaning flags are
> > > > set assuming say CC is gcc, but then it can be later set to HOSTCC
> > > > which may be clang. tools/scripts/Makefile.include is needed for host
> > > > set up and common macros in objtool's Makefile. Rather than override
> > > > CC to HOSTCC, just pass CC as HOSTCC to Makefile.build, the libsubcmd
> > > > builds and the linkage step. This means the Makefiles don't see things
> > > > like CC changing and tool flag determination, and similar, work
> > > > properly.
> > > >
> > > > Also, clear the passed subdir as otherwise an outer build may break by
> > > > inadvertently passing an inappropriate value.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile | 17 +++++++----------
> > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
> > > > index 1fe0082b2ecc..daed388aa5d7 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
> > > > @@ -18,14 +18,11 @@ else
> > > > endif
> > > >
> > > > # always use the host compiler
> > > > -AR = $(HOSTAR)
> > > > -CC = $(HOSTCC)
> > > > -LD = $(HOSTLD)
> > > > -ARCH = $(HOSTARCH)
> > > > +HOST_OVERRIDES := AR="$(HOSTAR)" CC="$(HOSTCC)" LD="$(HOSTLD)" ARCH="$(HOSTARCH)" \
> > > > + EXTRA_CFLAGS="$(HOSTCFLAGS) $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS)"
> > > > +
> > > > RM ?= rm
> > > > CROSS_COMPILE =
> > > > -CFLAGS := $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS)
> > > > -LDFLAGS := $(KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS)
> > > >
> > > > OUTPUT ?= $(srctree)/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/
> > > >
> > > > @@ -56,12 +53,12 @@ $(OUTPUT) $(OUTPUT)/libsubcmd $(LIBBPF_OUT):
> > > >
> > > > $(SUBCMDOBJ): fixdep FORCE | $(OUTPUT)/libsubcmd
> > > > $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(SUBCMD_SRC) OUTPUT=$(SUBCMD_OUT) \
> > > > - DESTDIR=$(SUBCMD_DESTDIR) prefix= \
> > > > + DESTDIR=$(SUBCMD_DESTDIR) $(HOST_OVERRIDES) prefix= subdir= \
> > > > $(abspath $@) install_headers
> > > >
> > > > $(BPFOBJ): $(wildcard $(LIBBPF_SRC)/*.[ch] $(LIBBPF_SRC)/Makefile) | $(LIBBPF_OUT)
> > > > $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(LIBBPF_SRC) OUTPUT=$(LIBBPF_OUT) \
> > > > - DESTDIR=$(LIBBPF_DESTDIR) prefix= EXTRA_CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" \
> > > > + DESTDIR=$(LIBBPF_DESTDIR) $(HOST_OVERRIDES) prefix= subdir= \
> > > > $(abspath $@) install_headers
> > > >
> > > > LIBELF_FLAGS := $(shell $(HOSTPKG_CONFIG) libelf --cflags 2>/dev/null)
> > > > @@ -80,11 +77,11 @@ export srctree OUTPUT CFLAGS Q
> > > > include $(srctree)/tools/build/Makefile.include
> > > >
> > > > $(BINARY_IN): fixdep FORCE prepare | $(OUTPUT)
> > > > - $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=resolve_btfids
> > > > + $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=resolve_btfids $(HOST_OVERRIDES)
> > > >
> > > > $(BINARY): $(BPFOBJ) $(SUBCMDOBJ) $(BINARY_IN)
> > > > $(call msg,LINK,$@)
> > > > - $(Q)$(CC) $(BINARY_IN) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(BPFOBJ) $(SUBCMDOBJ) $(LIBS)
> > > > + $(Q)$(HOSTCC) $(BINARY_IN) $(KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS) -o $@ $(BPFOBJ) $(SUBCMDOBJ) $(LIBS)
> > > >
> > > > clean_objects := $(wildcard $(OUTPUT)/*.o \
> > > > $(OUTPUT)/.*.o.cmd \
> > > > --
> > > > 2.39.0.246.g2a6d74b583-goog
> > > >
> > >
> > > I just bisected a linking failure when building resolve_btfids with
> > > clang to this change as commit 13e07691a16f ("tools/resolve_btfids:
> > > Alter how HOSTCC is forced") in the bpf-next tree.
> > >
> > > It appears to be related to whether or not CROSS_COMPILE is specified,
> > > which we have to do for certain architectures and configurations still.
> > > arm64 is not one of those but it helps demonstrate the issue.
> > >
> > > # Turn off CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_REDUCED and turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
> > > $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- HOSTLDFLAGS=-fuse-ld=lld LLVM=1 defconfig menuconfig
> > >
> > > $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- HOSTLDFLAGS=-fuse-ld=lld LLVM=1 prepare
> > > ld.lld: error: $LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids//resolve_btfids-in.o is incompatible with elf64-x86-64
> > > clang-17: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Before your change, with V=1, I see:
> > >
> > > clang -Wp,-MD,$LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/.main.o.d -Wp,-MT,$LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.o -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu11 -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -I$LINUX_SRC/tools/include -I$LINUX_SRC/tools/include/uapi -I$LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/libbpf/include -I$LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/libsubcmd/include -D"BUILD_STR(s)=#s" -c -o $LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.o main.c
> > >
> > > After, I see:
> > >
> > > clang -Wp,-MD,$LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/.main.o.d -Wp,-MT,$LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.o --target=aarch64-linux-gnu -g -I$LINUX_SRC/tools/include -I$LINUX_SRC/tools/include/uapi -I$LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/libbpf/include -I$LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/libsubcmd/include -D"BUILD_STR(s)=#s" -c -o $LINUX_SRC/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.o main.c
> > >
> > > We seem to have taken on a '--target=aarch64-linux-gnu' (changing the
> > > target of resolve_btfids-in.o) and we dropped the warning flags.
> > >
> > > I think this comes from the clang block in
> > > tools/scripts/Makefile.include, which is included into the
> > > resolve_btfids Makefile via tools/lib/bpf/Makefile.
> > >
> > > I am not super familiar with the tools build system, otherwise I would
> > > try to provide a patch. I tried moving CROSS_COMPILE from a recursive to
> > > simple variable ('=' -> ':=') and moving it to HOST_OVERRIDES but those
> > > did not appear to resolve it for me.
> > >
> > > If there is any other information I can provide or patches I can test,
> > > please let me know.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Nathan
> >
> > Thanks Nathan, and thanks for all the details in the bug report. I'm
> > looking into this.
> >
> > Ian
>
> Given the somewhat complicated cross compile I wasn't able to get a
> reproduction. Could you see if the following addresses the problem:

As long as you have an LLVM toolchain that targets AArch64 and your
host, you should be able to reproduce this issue with those commands
verbatim, as that command should not use any GNU binutils. I am pretty
sure I tried it in a fresh container before reporting it but it is
possible that I did not.

> ```
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
> b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
> index daed388aa5d7..a06966841df4 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/Makefile
> @@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ endif
>
> # always use the host compiler
> HOST_OVERRIDES := AR="$(HOSTAR)" CC="$(HOSTCC)" LD="$(HOSTLD)"
> ARCH="$(HOSTARCH)" \
> - EXTRA_CFLAGS="$(HOSTCFLAGS) $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS)"
> + EXTRA_CFLAGS="$(HOSTCFLAGS) $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS)"
> CROSS_COMPILE=""
>
> RM ?= rm
> -CROSS_COMPILE =
>
> OUTPUT ?= $(srctree)/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/
> ```
>

Unfortunately, it does not. I still see '--target=' end up in the
CFLAGS of those files.

Cheers,
Nathan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-27 00:04    [W:0.143 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site