| Date | Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:53:58 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 30/35] Documentation: tools/rtla: correct spelling |
| |
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:40:00 -0800 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> Correct spelling problems for Documentation/tools/rtla/ as reported > by codespell. > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> > Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > ---
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
> Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff -- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst > --- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst > +++ b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ and then when the *timerlat* thread was > then be used as the starting point of a more fine-grained analysis. > > Note that **rtla timerlat** was dispatched without changing *timerlat* tracer > -threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads hava > +threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads have > priority *FIFO:95* by default, which is a common priority used by real-time > kernel developers to analyze scheduling delays. >
|