Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 22 Jan 2023 22:35:43 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add QFPROM node | From | Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <> |
| |
On 1/22/2023 10:29 PM, Robert Marko wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 at 17:57, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy > <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> wrote: >> >> On 1/21/2023 4:53 PM, Robert Marko wrote: >>> IPQ8074 has efuses like other Qualcomm SoC-s that are required for >>> determining various HW quirks which will be required later for CPR etc, >>> so lets add the QFPROM node for start. >>> >>> Individidual fuses will be added as they are required. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi | 7 +++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi >>> index 8eba586065a3..f29491f647fe 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi >>> @@ -301,6 +301,13 @@ mdio: mdio@90000 { >>> status = "disabled"; >>> }; >>> >>> + qfprom: efuse@a4000 { >>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq8074-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom"; >>> + reg = <0x000a4000 0x1000>; >> >> From the HW document, I see the overall size of this region is 0x2000, >> any reason to stick with 0x1000? > Like always, I dont have access to docs and 0x1000 is all I could find > downstream > being used. > > Any chance you can share the regions inside of QFPROM, it would be great to use > the ECC corrected one if available.
Sorry, What do you refer by "ECC corrected" here?
Thanks, Kathiravan T.
> > Regards, > Robert >> Thanks, Kathiravan T. >> >> >>> + #address-cells = <1>; >>> + #size-cells = <1>; >>> + }; >>> + >>> prng: rng@e3000 { >>> compatible = "qcom,prng-ee"; >>> reg = <0x000e3000 0x1000>;
|  |