Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 22 Jan 2023 22:27:45 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add QFPROM node | From | Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <> |
| |
On 1/21/2023 4:53 PM, Robert Marko wrote: > IPQ8074 has efuses like other Qualcomm SoC-s that are required for > determining various HW quirks which will be required later for CPR etc, > so lets add the QFPROM node for start. > > Individidual fuses will be added as they are required. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi > index 8eba586065a3..f29491f647fe 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi > @@ -301,6 +301,13 @@ mdio: mdio@90000 { > status = "disabled"; > }; > > + qfprom: efuse@a4000 { > + compatible = "qcom,ipq8074-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom"; > + reg = <0x000a4000 0x1000>;
From the HW document, I see the overall size of this region is 0x2000, any reason to stick with 0x1000?
Thanks, Kathiravan T.
> + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + }; > + > prng: rng@e3000 { > compatible = "qcom,prng-ee"; > reg = <0x000e3000 0x1000>;
|  |