lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] Assume libbpf 1.0+
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:47 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:41:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Anyway, just a data point, I'll check if I'm missing installing it
> > somewhere.
>
> Just asked for libbpf-dev to be installed on the debian:11 container:
>
> [perfbuilder@five 11]$ dsh debian:11
> $ bash
> perfbuilder@589d1572e8cf:/$ ls -la /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbpf.so.0
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jan 10 2021 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbpf.so.0 -> libbpf.so.0.3.0
> perfbuilder@589d1572e8cf:/$ dpkg -l | grep bpf
> ii libbpf-dev:amd64 1:0.3-2 amd64 eBPF helper library (development files)
> ii libbpf0:amd64 1:0.3-2 amd64 eBPF helper library (shared library)
> ii libpfm4:amd64 4.11.1+git32-gd0b85fb-1 amd64 Library to program the performance monitoring events
> perfbuilder@589d1572e8cf:/$
>
> - Arnaldo

Right, the old/ancient libbpf-s are gross, but Debian doesn't use
LIBBPF_DYNAMIC which also isn't a default build option. I guess we
could say there's some testing impact from this cleanup, but I'm not
sure we care.

Thanks,
Ian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:48    [W:0.164 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site