[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/8] Compiler attributes: GCC function alignment workarounds
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:49 PM Mark Rutland <> wrote:
> It turns out that was a red herring; GCC is actually implicitly marking the
> abort() function as cold, and as Linux's implementation happened to be marked
> as weak I assumed that was the culprit.

That and your previous message probably explains probably why I
couldn't reproduce it.

Thanks a lot for all the details -- the `cold` issue is reproducible
since gcc 4.6 at least:

The `abort` case appears to happen since gcc 8.1.


 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:42    [W:0.154 / U:2.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site