Messages in this thread |  | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:06:48 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] sh: avoid using IRQ0 on SH3/4 |
| |
Hi Adrian,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 7:49 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2023, at 7:27 PM, Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> wrote: > >> On 5/3/22 11:42 PM, Sergey Shtylyov wrote: > >> Using IRQ0 by the platform devices is going to be disallowed soon (see [1]) > >> and even now, when IRQ0 is about to be returned by platfrom_get_irq(), you > >> see a big warning. The code supporting SH3/4 SoCs maps the IRQ #s starting > >> at 0 -- modify that code to start the IRQ #s from 16 instead. > >> > >> The patch should mostly affect the AP-SH4A-3A/AP-SH4AD-0A boards as they > >> indeed use IRQ0 for the SMSC911x compatible Ethernet chip... > >> > >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/025679e1-1f0a-ae4b-4369-01164f691511@omp.ru/ > >> > >> Fixes: a85a6c86c25b ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is invalid") > >> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> > >> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > >> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > >> Tested-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> > >> > >> --- > >> The patch is against Linus Torvalds' 'linux.git' repo. > > > > So, this patch hasn't been merged... may I ask why? :-( > > The SH maintainers have been MIA which is why the other maintainers want to kill the architecture again. > > I’m seriously considering adopting the architecture. > > Not sure whether Linus would grant that though.
Why not?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
|  |