Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Jan 2023 15:16:46 +0100 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC v7 03/64] KVM: SVM: Advertise private memory support to KVM |
| |
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:17:41PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote: > In the case of SEV, it would still be up to userspace whether or not it > actually wants to make use of UPM functionality like KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES > and private memslots. Otherwise, to maintain backward-compatibility, > userspace can do things as it has always done and continue running SEV without > relying on private memslots/KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES or any of the new ioctls. > > For SNP however it is required that userspace uses/implements UPM > functionality.
Makes sense to me.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
| |