lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [lvc-project] [PATCH] iio: chemical: scd30: Add check for NULL in scd30_i2c_command
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 9:27 PM Alexey Khoroshilov
<khoroshilov@ispras.ru> wrote:
> On 13.01.2023 21:47, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 8:41 PM Alexey Khoroshilov
> > <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> wrote:
> >> On 13.01.2023 16:33, Anastasia Belova wrote:
> >
> >> It seems it is better to put the whole validation loop under if (rsp)
> >> check.
> >
> > No. The entire patch is redundant.
> > The code that calls this function is under the control of the same
> > driver, so we know how to avoid shooting in our foot.
>
> I see, there is an assumption that response is NULL iff size is zero.

Yes. ->read() is called with (NULL, 0) and the code copes with this.
A similar situation was discussed recently and Linus T. rejected a
proposed change in vsnprintf().

> May be it could be documented, because naming of arguments does not make
> such assumption obvious for fresh readers.

Documentation improvements are always appreciated!

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:41    [W:0.066 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site