lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "dt-bindings: power: rpmpd: Add SM4250 support"
From
On 13/01/2023 17:36, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 13.01.2023 17:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/01/2023 16:22, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> SM4250 and SM6115 use a shared device tree and the RPMPDs are
>>> identical. There's no need for a separate entry, so remove it.
>>>
>>> This reverts commit 45ac44ed10e58cf9b510e6552317ed7d2602346f.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 -
>>> include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 10 ----------
>>> 2 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>>> index 633d49884019..5bb9f59d196f 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>>> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ properties:
>>> - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
>>> - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd
>>> - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd
>>> - - qcom,sm4250-rpmpd
>>
>> Yet, dedicated compatibles are usually recommended. Maybe this should be
>> used with fallback:
>> "qcom,sm4250-rpmpd", "qcom,sm6115-rpmpd"
> The compatible has never been used so far and it's really the
> same situation as SDM630/660 AFAIK, so I don't think it makes
> much sense.

OK, assuming these are almost the same SoCs in that aspect:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:39    [W:0.032 / U:1.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site