Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:35:32 +0100 | From | Michal Koutný <> | Subject | Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3] blk-throtl: Introduce sync and async queues for blk-throtl |
| |
Hello.
Thanks all for sharing ideas and more details (in time-previous messages).
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 02:07:38AM +0800, hanjinke <hanjinke.666@bytedance.com> wrote: > But for some specific scenarios with old kernel versions, blk-throtl > is alose needed. The scenario described in my email is in the early stage of > research and extensive testing for it. During this period,some priority > inversion issues amoug cgroups or within one cgroup have been observed. So I > send this patch to try to fix or mitigate some of these issues.
Jinke, do you combine blk-throtl with memory limits? (As that could in theory indirectly reduce async requests as dirtier would be slowed down.)
Thanks, Michal [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |