lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2023]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [External] Re: [PATCH v3] blk-throtl: Introduce sync and async queues for blk-throtl
Hello.

Thanks all for sharing ideas and more details (in time-previous messages).

On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 02:07:38AM +0800, hanjinke <hanjinke.666@bytedance.com> wrote:
> But for some specific scenarios with old kernel versions, blk-throtl
> is alose needed. The scenario described in my email is in the early stage of
> research and extensive testing for it. During this period,some priority
> inversion issues amoug cgroups or within one cgroup have been observed. So I
> send this patch to try to fix or mitigate some of these issues.

Jinke, do you combine blk-throtl with memory limits? (As that could in theory
indirectly reduce async requests as dirtier would be slowed down.)

Thanks,
Michal
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2023-03-26 23:36    [W:0.105 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site