Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Jan 2023 23:19:53 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] bit_spinlock: Include <asm/processor.h> | From | Vineet Gupta <> |
| |
On 1/8/23 11:04, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > In an attempt to simplify some includes in <include/dcache.h>, it > appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that <linux/bit_spinlock.h> > was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax(). > (see [1]) > > It broke on arc.
It its just ARC that broke, maybe we can do something there ?
> Include <asm/processor.h> in <linux/bit_spinlock.h> to fix the issue. > This will help remove some un-needed includes from <include/dcache.h>. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301082130.LXMj5qkD-lkp@intel.com/ > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> > --- > Not sure who to send this to. > get_maintainer.pl is of no help, and the file is untouched from a too long > time. > > Greg? Dan? Any pointer? > --- > include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h > index bbc4730a6505..d0fd2a7afca2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h > +++ b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > #ifndef __LINUX_BIT_SPINLOCK_H > #define __LINUX_BIT_SPINLOCK_H > > +#include <asm/processor.h> > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/preempt.h> > #include <linux/atomic.h>
| |